[maemo-developers] SBOX_CPU=arm, not armel?
From: Guillem Jover guillem.jover at nokia.comDate: Tue Mar 20 16:21:26 EET 2007
- Previous message: SBOX_CPU=arm, not armel?
- Next message: compiler can't find glibconfigure.h
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 22:48:07 +0100, ext Patrick Ohly wrote: > My problem is that after setting up a new ARM target via sb-menu and > selecting it, "uname -a" says that my architecture is "arm", not > "armel". "arm" is also the value of > SBOX_UNAME_MACHINE/SBOX_DPKG_INST_ARCH in my environment and the setting > of SBOX_CPU in the target's .config file. There's no such cpu as armel, so uname, SBOX_CPU and SBOX_UNAME_MACHINE are correct being arm, SBOX_DPKG_INST_ARCH being the Debian architecture name is wrong, it should be armel (which is just a symbolic name, encoding the cpu+abi+kernel). > How does scratchbox determine which flavor of ARM I want to emulate? > Where do I need to look for an installation mistake? The target Debian architecture should get determined using the toolchain. Did you install an EABI toolchain? > When I create a target and install the "cputrans" devkit, then I can > select multiple versions of qemu-arm, including versions 0.7.0, 0.8.0, > and arm-0.8.1-sb2 and armeb-0.8.1-sb2. Which one is the right one, if > any? Take the -mN if there's any. regards, guillem
- Previous message: SBOX_CPU=arm, not armel?
- Next message: compiler can't find glibconfigure.h
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]