[maemo-developers] Wishlist (was:Re: N800 and USB host mode)

From: Daniel Stone daniel.stone at nokia.com
Date: Fri Mar 9 00:58:47 EET 2007
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 01:06:00PM -0800, ext Daniel Amelang wrote:
> On 3/7/07, Eero Tamminen <eero.tamminen at nokia.com> wrote:
> >Err.  Translucency means compositing and keeping the composited items in
> >memory.  Due to additional memory accesses needed for this, it would be
> >slower (and take more memory) regardless of how "accelerated" it would
> >be.
> Keeping the composited items in memory is not necessary. After you
> composite, you can (and often) just keep the final result around.

The Composite extension to the X server requires a backing pixmap for
every window, and a final pixmap which is essentially the fb.  So, while
you're right about compositing as a concept, I think Eero's talking abou
the possibility of using the Composite extension.

> >You can see this even on Desktop, just ask how many gamers are happy
> >with integrated graphics cards which share memory with the rest of the
> >system instead of having (hundreds of megs) of their own memory in which
> >to store textures etc. and in where the operations can be done without
> >loading the memory bus of the rest of the system (downside is that all
> >this costs, adds to the computer power consumption & heating).  :-)
> I don't totally agree here either. It sounds like you're saying that
> the hardware acceleration won't get you much unless you have dedicated
> video memory.

He is, and I'm willing to back him up.

> Here's a counter-example: the macbook uses an integrated graphics card
> to do all of its fancy accelerated UI effects, including translucency.
> Yes, the macbook is not a gaming machine, but that's not the issue,
> here. The issue is that hardware-accelerated graphics enable advanced
> user interfaces, even w/out dedicated video memory.

It would be nice if we had the MacBook hardware in the N800's form
factor, with the exact same power consumption.  Tragically, this is not
the case, and our memory bandwidth is, shall we say, not staggeringly
high, limited both by raw clock speed, and memory bus design.

The MacBook has PCIE, and fast main memory, meaning that it's able to
push textures between the GPU and main memory at a blazing fast rate.
N800 has its own 'video memory' for the final framebuffer (so your main
memory isn't impacted by the load of scanning out), but the rest would
have to be done in main memory, where you're in direct contention with
applications for the bandwidth.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/attachments/20070309/7e5e0471/attachment.pgp 
More information about the maemo-developers mailing list